Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.
The Thomson Corporation inin-cites logoites
ScientistsPapersInstitutionsJournalsCountriesH O M ERSS feeds


S E A R C H
incites



PAPERS

Scientists
Papers
Institutions
Journals
Countries
 

The Top 10...
Analysis of...
Site Map by Fields
Overview Menu of all Interviews
Podcasts
Hot Papers published within the last 2 years
Current Classics
SCI-BYTES - What's New in Research
What's New in Research

in-cites, July 2001
Citing URL - http://www.in-cites.com/papers/Dr-Axel-Becke.html

Papers

             
An interview with:
Dr. Axel Becke
           

In this interview, Dr. Axel Becke of Queen’s University at Kingston, Ontario, Canada, discusses his highly cited work on the density-functional theory of atomic and molecular structure. Six of Dr. Becke’s papers on this topic have been cited a total of 4,663 times. According to our analysis of high-impact papers in chemistry, Dr. Becke’s most-cited paper is "Density-functional thermochemistry .3. The role of exact exchange," (Journal of Chemical Physics, 98 [7]: 5648-52, 1 April, 1993), which has been cited more than 3,208 times. Dr. Becke is also the recipient of the 2000 Schroedinger Medal from the World Association of Theoretically Oriented Chemists.

What prior research or whose prior work helped to start you on your way?

My undergraduate and graduate studies were in the fields of engineering and theoretical physics, respectively. As a graduate student at McMaster University (Hamilton, Canada) I was a member Dr. Axel Beckeof the theoretical nuclear physics group, where I received a thorough grounding in quantum mechanics and many-body theory. I found the (many) books of John Slater on the quantum theory of matter to be highly readable and especially useful and inspiring.

In particular, Slater and Keith Johnson were espousing at the time (late 1970s) an exciting and very economical approach to atomic and molecular structure computations known as the "muffin-tin" or "scattered-wave" X-alpha method. Despite its shortcomings, both theoretical and numerical, I found the method fascinating. The subsequent years of my career have been devoted to trying to understand and improve both the theory underlying the X-alpha method, and its numerical implementation. As my understanding advanced, I adopted the more rigorous theoretical framework of Walter Kohn (i.e., density-functional theory: DFT) and strove to evolve the all-important exchange-correlation functional in DFT as far as possible.

Tremendously encouraging as well was the work of Tom Ziegler (University of Calgary, Canada). He was the first to apply the new exchange-correlation functionals to significant and challenging problems in organometallic chemistry in the mid-1980s, demonstrating the great promise of DFT as a practical and accurate computational tool.

What would you rate as your most difficult or trying professional moment?

For a while, my Ph.D. thesis seemed doomed never to see completion! After writing the first-ever non-LCAO grid-based code for molecular orbital calculations in chemistry, I computed X-alpha spectroscopic properties of several diatomic molecules. The resulting bond energies were seriously in error. No amount of debugging effort could change those baffling numbers... until discussions with Tom Ziegler (who was a postdoctoral fellow at McMaster at the time) revealed that I was performing the atomic reference calculations incorrectly. That is how I learned the difference between density functionals and SPIN density functionals.

After all that, the thesis examination itself was suspended by the external examiner for insufficient referencing and too few computational results! Though a disappointing setback, the criticisms were correct, and a much-improved document was submitted several months later and successfully defended.

Other most trying professional moments? Lecturing to freshman classes of hundreds of engineering students!

Which of your professional achievements brings you the most satisfaction?

Twice, once for diatomics and a second time for polyatomics, I have written programs from scratch to perform non-LCAO grid-based computations of electronic orbitals in molecules. These have been very satisfying and creative efforts for me, and I hope to return to this kind of work again in the future.

Also, I am very pleased to have been lucky enough to discover a path to honing the accuracy of density-functional theory to its present level of respectability. We progressed significantly from the vagaries of the old X-alpha method to the widespread popularity of modern DFT in the last two decades of the twentieth century.

Did you expect to become highly cited, or is this surprising to you?

It was unexpected. My work was known only to a relatively small community of theoretical and computational specialists, until DFT methodologies were adopted by Peter Gill, Benny Johnson, John Pople, and Michael Frisch into the GAUSSIAN molecular structure program in 1992. This was the event that made DFT available, for the first time, to an enormous user base of computational chemists.

What lessons would you draw from your work to pass on to the next generation of researchers?

Persistence. Persistence. Persistence. Ask the BIG questions... the general questions... and don't be sidetracked until you are perfectly satisfied with the answers (if that ever happens!).

If you had the power to make a single, sweeping change in the way that scientific research is conducted and presented, what would it be?

Preserve and protect democratic funding of small scale, independent researchers. True breakthroughs are the outcome of serendipity and are (by definition) unforeseen. It is misguided to place too much faith in the funding of strategic, highly networked, business-like, results-driven research. The independent but promising dreamer should not be forgotten.End of interview

Dr. Axel D. Becke
Queen’s University at Kingston
Department of Chemistry
Kingston, Ontario, Canada

 

in-cites, July 2001
Citing URL - http://www.in-cites.com/papers/Dr-Axel-Becke.html


ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Home | Search | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright
Contact Webmaster with questions/comments |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.