Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.
The Thomson Corporation inin-cites logoites
ScientistsPapersInstitutionsJournalsCountriesH O M ERSS feeds


S E A R C H
incites



PAPERS

Scientists
Papers
Institutions
Journals
Countries
 

The Top 10...
Analysis of...
Site Map by Fields
Overview Menu of all Interviews
Podcasts
Hot Papers published within the last 2 years
Current Classics
SCI-BYTES - What's New in Research
What's New in Research

in-cites, November 2003
 http://www.in-cites.com/papers/DrChrisSimon.html

Papers

             
An interview with:
Dr. Chris Simon
           

In this interview, Dr. Chris Simon talks about her highly cited paper, “Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved PCR primers” (C. Simon, F. Frati, A. Beckenbach, B. Crespi, H. Liu, and P. Flook. Annals Entomol. Soc. Am. 87: 651-701, 1994). According to the ISI Essential Science Indicators  Web product, this paper currently ranks at #4 in the field of Plant & Animal Sciences, with 581 cites to date. Dr. Simon’s record in this field includes 11 of her papers occurring in journals covered by ISI cited a total of 695 times to date. Dr. Simon is a Professor in the University of Connecticut’s Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology as well as the Editor of the journal Systematic Biology.

  Why do you think your paper is highly cited?

By understanding the way in which genes evolve, function, and are structured, it is possible to gain insights that can be used in improving the way that evolutionary trees (phylogenies) are constructed from DNA data.

The field of molecular systematic continues to grow rapidly. Animal mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is still widely used for building evolutionary trees. MtDNA is an ideal marker for phylogenetic studies because it is maternally inherited, shows almost no recombination, evolves quickly, loses polymorphisms quickly, and is abundant and easy to extract. Following the advent of PCR, the availability of highly conserved mitochondrial markers meant that almost any animal tissues could be sequenced even if no previous DNA sequence existed. Our paper describes the major problems in molecular systematics, reviews patterns of evolution of genes, discusses how models of evolution or weighting can be used to help overcome the difficult problem of multiple substitutions, reviews insect mtDNA systematics studies up to 1993, and presents a compilation of conserved PCR primers. Our paper was highly cited and continues to be because it and the references provided within summarize everything that a student would need to know to get started with a molecular systematics project. It also provides a useful review for more established workers.

  What are the circumstances which led you to your work?

In 1988 I visited the laboratory of Alan Wilson. PCR had been developed three years earlier, but mitochondrial primers were only then being developed. I brought DNA from periodical cicadas with me. In the Wilson lab, I amplified this cicada DNA with primers developed for human mtDNA. Ironically, these unusual insects, not Drosophila, were the first insects to be amplified by PCR.

I was invited to write a review article on insect molecular systematics for the Annals of the Entomological Society of America and, at the same time, Crespi had approached me to collaborate on a mitochondrial PCR primer compilation. Many of these primers had been developed in the lab of Beckenbach. The paper thus originated as a discussion among colleagues. Two of the other authors were postdocs in the Simon lab and one was a former postdoc in the Beckenbach lab.

  Would you describe the significance of this work for your field?

It provided a condensed guide to molecular systematics problems and applications. The review of the properties of molecular systematic data was applicable to all fields. The primer compilation appendix provided a standardized, informative naming system for PCR primers via which the location of the primer and the size of the expected product could be easily determined. The primer compilation was applicable to all animals, not just insects.

  Where has this research gone since the publication of your paper? Where do you see it going 10 years from now?

Over the last 10 years the Simon lab has produced a series of publications focusing on how knowledge of molecular processes can improve phylogenetic analysis. Of particular to interest to us has been how variation in the rate of molecular evolution among sites in a DNA sequence can be accommodated in phylogenetic analysis. Several papers focusing on the analysis of the structure of rRNA molecules contributed to the understanding of rate variation among sites and helped to evaluate current DNA alignment procedures. In addition, the Simon lab focused on the molecular systematics and biodiversity of insects, especially cicadas.

Currently, rapid progress is being made by the Simon laboratory in producing generic and species-level molecular phylogenies for New Zealand cicadas and representatives of their tribe worldwide. Mating-signal evolution is being studied by mapping male song characteristics onto phylogenetic trees. Much of this research has general importance to studies of speciation, sexual selection, and evolution in general. In collaboration with NZ colleagues, the Simon lab is studying 19 contact zones between NZ cicada species of different degrees of relatedness. Microsatellite data and songs against a backdrop of an mtDNA phylogeny are being used to search for evidence of gene flow between species. Similar work on speciation, but in relation to life history and song variation, is being pursued using the North American cicada genus Magicicada.

The longer-term goals of the Simon lab are to finish the description of all NZ and Australian cicada species, to construct phylogenetic relationships for all world genera and selected species groups that are tied to interesting evolutionary questions, and to revise the tribes and subfamilies of cicadas worldwide. Also of interest is to use these phylogenies and molecular dating techniques to recreate the Mesozoic and Cenozoic biogeography of the group. The Simon lab is part of a larger group of principal investigators studying Paraneoptera (lice, thrips, plant-sucking bugs, and true bugs). This group is part of a worldwide effort to construct a "Tree of Life" phylogeny for all organisms. Such a tree would accelerate the rate at which progress could be made in studying all aspects of biological evolution.

  What lessons would you draw from your work to share with the next generation of researchers?

It is critically important to know the natural history of your study subject. This principle applies to DNA as well as to whole organisms. By understanding the way in which genes evolve, function, and are structured, it is possible to gain insights that can be used in improving the way that evolutionary trees (phylogenies) are constructed from DNA data. It is important to look at your data and to think carefully how it is analyzed. Similarly, to study evolution, it is important to understand the biology and life history of species under study, sample multiple individuals per species, and survey genetic variation over geography.End of interview

Dr. Chris Simon
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CN, USA

in-cites, November 2003
 http://www.in-cites.com/papers/DrChrisSimon.html


ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Home | Search | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright
Contact Webmaster with questions/comments |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.