|
|  |
|
in-cites,
November 2003
http://www.in-cites.com/papers/DrChrisSimon.html
|
|

 |
 |
An
interview with:
Dr. Chris Simon |
 |

 |
n this interview, Dr. Chris Simon talks about her highly cited paper, “Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved PCR primers” (C. Simon, F. Frati, A. Beckenbach, B. Crespi, H. Liu, and P. Flook.
Annals Entomol. Soc. Am. 87: 651-701, 1994). According to the
ISI
Essential Science Indicators
Web product, this paper currently ranks at #4 in the field of Plant & Animal Sciences, with 581 cites to date. Dr. Simon’s record in this field includes 11 of her papers occurring in journals covered by ISI cited a total of 695 times to date. Dr. Simon is a Professor in the University of Connecticut’s Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology as well as the Editor of the journal Systematic Biology.
|
Why do you think your paper is highly cited?
|

|
|
By understanding the way in which genes evolve, function, and are structured, it is possible to gain insights that can be used in improving the way that evolutionary trees (phylogenies) are constructed from DNA data.
|
|
The field of molecular systematic continues to grow rapidly. Animal
mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is still widely used for building
evolutionary trees. MtDNA is an ideal marker for phylogenetic studies
because it is maternally inherited, shows almost no recombination,
evolves quickly, loses polymorphisms quickly, and is abundant and easy
to extract. Following the advent of PCR, the availability of highly
conserved mitochondrial markers meant that almost any animal tissues
could be sequenced even if no previous DNA sequence existed. Our paper
describes the major problems in molecular systematics, reviews
patterns of evolution of genes, discusses how models of evolution or
weighting can be used to help overcome the difficult problem of
multiple substitutions, reviews insect mtDNA systematics studies up to
1993, and presents a compilation of conserved PCR primers. Our paper
was highly cited and continues to be because it and the references
provided within summarize everything that a student would need to know
to get started with a molecular systematics project. It also provides
a useful review for more established workers.
What are the circumstances which led you to your work?
In 1988 I visited the laboratory of Alan Wilson. PCR had been
developed three years earlier, but mitochondrial primers were only
then being developed. I brought DNA from periodical cicadas with me.
In the Wilson lab, I amplified this cicada DNA with primers developed
for human mtDNA. Ironically, these unusual insects, not Drosophila,
were the first insects to be amplified by PCR.
I was invited to write a review article on insect molecular
systematics for the Annals of the Entomological Society of America
and, at the same time, Crespi had approached me to collaborate on a
mitochondrial PCR primer compilation. Many of these primers had been
developed in the lab of Beckenbach. The paper thus originated as a
discussion among colleagues. Two of the other authors were postdocs in
the Simon lab and one was a former postdoc in the Beckenbach lab.
Would you describe the significance of this work for your field?
It provided a condensed guide to molecular systematics problems and
applications. The review of the properties of molecular systematic
data was applicable to all fields. The primer compilation appendix
provided a standardized, informative naming system for PCR primers via
which the location of the primer and the size of the expected product
could be easily determined. The primer compilation was applicable to
all animals, not just insects.
Where has this research gone since the publication of your paper?
Where do you see it going 10 years from now?
Over the last 10 years the Simon lab has produced a series of
publications focusing on how knowledge of molecular processes can
improve phylogenetic analysis. Of particular to interest to us has
been how variation in the rate of molecular evolution among sites in a
DNA sequence can be accommodated in phylogenetic analysis. Several
papers focusing on the analysis of the structure of rRNA molecules
contributed to the understanding of rate variation among sites and
helped to evaluate current DNA alignment procedures. In addition, the
Simon lab focused on the molecular systematics and biodiversity of
insects, especially cicadas.
Currently, rapid progress is being made by the Simon laboratory in
producing generic and species-level molecular phylogenies for New
Zealand cicadas and representatives of their tribe worldwide.
Mating-signal evolution is being studied by mapping male song
characteristics onto phylogenetic trees. Much of this research has
general importance to studies of speciation, sexual selection, and
evolution in general. In collaboration with NZ colleagues, the Simon
lab is studying 19 contact zones between NZ cicada species of
different degrees of relatedness. Microsatellite data and songs
against a backdrop of an mtDNA phylogeny are being used to search for
evidence of gene flow between species. Similar work on speciation, but
in relation to life history and song variation, is being pursued using
the North American cicada genus Magicicada.
The longer-term goals of the Simon lab are to finish the
description of all NZ and Australian cicada species, to construct
phylogenetic relationships for all world genera and selected species
groups that are tied to interesting evolutionary questions, and to
revise the tribes and subfamilies of cicadas worldwide. Also of
interest is to use these phylogenies and molecular dating techniques
to recreate the Mesozoic and Cenozoic biogeography of the group. The
Simon lab is part of a larger group of principal investigators
studying Paraneoptera (lice, thrips, plant-sucking bugs, and
true bugs). This group is part of a worldwide effort to construct a
"Tree of Life" phylogeny for all organisms. Such a tree
would accelerate the rate at which progress could be made in studying
all aspects of biological evolution.
What lessons would you draw from your work to share with the next
generation of researchers?
It is critically important to know the natural history of your
study subject. This principle applies to DNA as well as to whole
organisms. By understanding the way in which genes evolve, function,
and are structured, it is possible to gain insights that can be used
in improving the way that evolutionary trees (phylogenies) are
constructed from DNA data. It is important to look at your data and to
think carefully how it is analyzed. Similarly, to study evolution, it
is important to understand the biology and life history of species
under study, sample multiple individuals per species, and survey
genetic variation over geography.
Dr. Chris Simon
University of Connecticut
Storrs, CN, USA
|
|
|
in-cites, November 2003
http://www.in-cites.com/papers/DrChrisSimon.html
|
|