|
|  |
|
in-cites,
February 2004
http://www.in-cites.com/papers/DrRonAndersen.html
|
|

 |
 |
An
interview with:
Dr. Ron Andersen |
 |

 |
n
the interview below, Dr. Ron Andersen talks about his highly
cited paper, "Revisiting the behavioral model and access
to medical care—does it matter?" (J. Health Soc.
Behavior 36[1]: 1-10, March 1995). This paper has been
cited 336 times to date, placing it among the 10 most-cited
papers in the field of Social Sciences in the past decade.
According to the ISI
Essential Science Indicators
Web product, Dr. Andersen’s record in this field includes 20
papers cited a total of 523 times to date. Dr. Andersen is the
Wasserman Professor of Health Services and Professor of
Sociology at UCLA’s School of Public Health.
|
Why do you think your paper is highly cited?
This paper summarized much of my thinking and its evolution over
the previous 30 years concerning people's access to medical care. It
was published in a fairly salient journal concerning social science
and health. It deals with a topic of continuing interest in health
services research, medical sociology, and for policy makers
concerned with the organization and delivery of medical care.
What are the circumstances which led you to your work?
|

“I was struck by the differences in the kinds and amounts of medical care that people in the U.S. used, and was concerned about why some had good access to medical care and others did not.”
|
|
I was a doctoral student in a medical sociology training program
under the direction of Dr. Robert Eichhorn at Purdue University in
1963. The Center for Health Administration Studies and NORC at the
University of Chicago, with Dr. Odin Anderson as the principal
investigator, had a grant from what is now the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality to do a national survey study of medical care use
and expenditures. I was hired as the study director for the project
with the agreement that as I directed the study I would also be
supported to use data from the study for my dissertation. I was struck
by the differences in the kinds and amounts of medical care that
people in the U.S. used, and was concerned about why some had good
access to medical care and others did not. To try to better understand
these variations, for my dissertation I developed a behavioral model
of health services use which suggested that access to care was
determined by different characteristics of people including
predisposing factors (e.g., age, gender, education, ethnicity, health
beliefs), enabling factors (e.g., having a regular source of medical
care and health insurance) and need (e.g., their perceptions of their
health and physician's judgments about their need for care). I have
continued to work on this problem for my entire career.
How would you describe the significance of this work for your
field?
My work was a fairly early effort to try to apply some ideas and
methods from the social sciences in a systematic way to attempt to
understand a complex and highly valued kind of behavior in our
society—use of health services and access to medical care.
Apparently, it has been somewhat helpful to students and
practitioners in health services as they consider issues of access,
quality, and cost of care. It also seems relevant to many of us
concerned with inequities in health care delivery and disparities in
health and health care use according to ethnicity and social class.
Where has this research gone since the publication of your
paper? Where do you see it going 10 years from now?
The model has evolved over the years from a focus on simple
measures of access (e.g., whether or not people see a physician or
are admitted to a hospital) to one stressing more whether access is
effective (e.g., improves peoples’ health) and efficient (can be
effective and still contain costs). I have also concentrated more on
access for vulnerable population groups (e.g., homeless persons and
people with HIV). Some of my current interests are better
understanding how community and organizational factors (as well as
their own personal characteristics) influence access to care and why
we observe ethnic differences in health and access to care.
What lessons would you draw from your work to share with the
next generation of researchers?
We have so many problems with our health care system concerning
issues of access, quality and cost. At the same time there are
exciting new methods and ideas in health services research that can
be applied to better understand and, hopefully, do something about
these problems. I hope the next generation of researchers will see
these conditions as wonderful opportunities to do well by doing
good.
Ronald M. Andersen, Ph.D.
UCLA School of Public Health
Los Angeles, CA, USA
|
|
|
in-cites, February 2004
http://www.in-cites.com/papers/DrRonAndersen.html
|
|