Beginning in mid-February 2008, the 1997-2007 online version of the Science Watch® newsletter, ESI-Topics.com, and in-cites.com, will all be featured together on the redesigned ScienceWatch.com. All previous content from the three sites will be permanently archived, and remain accessible from any existing bookmarks to the archived pages. No new content will be added to this site. Updates and new content (updated biweekly) are available at ScienceWatch.com now.
The Thomson Corporation inin-cites logoites
ScientistsPapersInstitutionsJournalsCountriesH O M ERSS feeds


S E A R C H
incites



PAPERS

Scientists
Papers
Institutions
Journals
Countries
 

The Top 10...
Analysis of...
Site Map by Fields
Overview Menu of all Interviews
Podcasts
Hot Papers published within the last 2 years
Current Classics
SCI-BYTES - What's New in Research
What's New in Research

in-cites, February 2004
 http://www.in-cites.com/papers/DrRonAndersen.html

Papers

             
An interview with:
Dr. Ron Andersen
           

n the interview below, Dr. Ron Andersen talks about his highly cited paper, "Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care—does it matter?" (J. Health Soc. Behavior 36[1]: 1-10, March 1995). This paper has been cited 336 times to date, placing it among the 10 most-cited papers in the field of Social Sciences in the past decade. According to the ISI Essential Science Indicators Web product, Dr. Andersen’s record in this field includes 20 papers cited a total of 523 times to date. Dr. Andersen is the Wasserman Professor of Health Services and Professor of Sociology at UCLA’s School of Public Health.

  Why do you think your paper is highly cited?

This paper summarized much of my thinking and its evolution over the previous 30 years concerning people's access to medical care. It was published in a fairly salient journal concerning social science and health. It deals with a topic of continuing interest in health services research, medical sociology, and for policy makers concerned with the organization and delivery of medical care.

  What are the circumstances which led you to your work?


I was struck by the differences in the kinds and amounts of medical care that people in the U.S. used, and was concerned about why some had good access to medical care and others did not.”

I was a doctoral student in a medical sociology training program under the direction of Dr. Robert Eichhorn at Purdue University in 1963. The Center for Health Administration Studies and NORC at the University of Chicago, with Dr. Odin Anderson as the principal investigator, had a grant from what is now the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality to do a national survey study of medical care use and expenditures. I was hired as the study director for the project with the agreement that as I directed the study I would also be supported to use data from the study for my dissertation. I was struck by the differences in the kinds and amounts of medical care that people in the U.S. used, and was concerned about why some had good access to medical care and others did not. To try to better understand these variations, for my dissertation I developed a behavioral model of health services use which suggested that access to care was determined by different characteristics of people including predisposing factors (e.g., age, gender, education, ethnicity, health beliefs), enabling factors (e.g., having a regular source of medical care and health insurance) and need (e.g., their perceptions of their health and physician's judgments about their need for care). I have continued to work on this problem for my entire career.

  How would you describe the significance of this work for your field?

My work was a fairly early effort to try to apply some ideas and methods from the social sciences in a systematic way to attempt to understand a complex and highly valued kind of behavior in our society—use of health services and access to medical care. Apparently, it has been somewhat helpful to students and practitioners in health services as they consider issues of access, quality, and cost of care. It also seems relevant to many of us concerned with inequities in health care delivery and disparities in health and health care use according to ethnicity and social class.

  Where has this research gone since the publication of your paper? Where do you see it going 10 years from now?

The model has evolved over the years from a focus on simple measures of access (e.g., whether or not people see a physician or are admitted to a hospital) to one stressing more whether access is effective (e.g., improves peoples’ health) and efficient (can be effective and still contain costs). I have also concentrated more on access for vulnerable population groups (e.g., homeless persons and people with HIV). Some of my current interests are better understanding how community and organizational factors (as well as their own personal characteristics) influence access to care and why we observe ethnic differences in health and access to care.

  What lessons would you draw from your work to share with the next generation of researchers?

We have so many problems with our health care system concerning issues of access, quality and cost. At the same time there are exciting new methods and ideas in health services research that can be applied to better understand and, hopefully, do something about these problems. I hope the next generation of researchers will see these conditions as wonderful opportunities to do well by doing good.End of interview

Ronald M. Andersen, Ph.D.
UCLA School of Public Health
Los Angeles, CA, USA

in-cites, February 2004
 http://www.in-cites.com/papers/DrRonAndersen.html


ScienceWatch.com - Tracking Trends and Perfomance in Basic Research
Go to the new ScienceWatch.com

Home | Search | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Copyright
Contact Webmaster with questions/comments |
(c) 2008 The Thomson Corporation.