Would you give us some
background on your education and research
interests?
I studied Chemistry and Physics at the University of Grenoble,
and received my Ph.D. in 1984 in paleoclimatology, on studies of the
aeolian dust record from Antarctic ice cores. At present, I am a
research scientist (Directeur de Recherche) at the CNRS.
|

“The data extracted from this ice core had implications throughout the fields of glaciology and
paleoclimatology.”
|
|
My main scientific interests are polar ice geochemistry,
paleoclimatology, geophysics, and glacio-biology. I am involved in
the study of several deep Antarctic ice cores (Vostok, Epica Dome C,
Droning Maud) through international collaboration (Europe,
Federation of Russia) aiming to depict climate and environmental
changes over the late Quaternary.
Currently, I am also involved in the search for life in ice and
in subglacial lakes (the subglacial Lake Vostok), collaborating with
molecular biologists from Russia and France (Universities of Brest
and Lyon).
Would you please sum up your 1999 Nature paper,
"Climate and atmospheric history of the past 420,000 years from
the Vostok ice core, Antarctica"?
This paper presented the first long climatic record from the ice
(420,000 years), providing a continuous record of the temperature
and atmospheric composition (CO2 and CH4) along with the dust and
sea salt aerosols and isotope composition of atmospheric oxygen.
The ice core was 3,350 m long and drilled at the top of the
Antarctic ice sheet at the (Soviet, now Russian) station of Vostok
(3,488 m above sea level, mean annual temperature -55C). The paper
extended the previous Vostok record (150 kyrs) which was already a
first, with three articles in Nature (1987) dealing with the
same subject.
Extension of the ice core in depth (below 2.2 km—the ice
thickness is 3.7 km at Vostok) was very slow and took almost 10
years because of the technical difficulties (the drill was lost) and
the collapse of the Soviet Union led the Vostok station to close
several times for winter. The international collaboration (France
and the USA) was very useful and helped to resume the drilling, and
the Russian drillers were able to continue in depth (3,350 m reached
in 1998).
The article was co-signed by 18 authors from the three
collaborative nations (Russia, USA, and France), and I got the honor
to be the first author. The scientific merit of this work should be
shared with my co-authors.
The new record depicted the last four climatic cycles and the
succession of glacial-interglacial periods. Glacial periods
represent more than 80% of the time of a climatic cycle (of about
100 kyrs). Interglacial periods display different patterns and they
lasted variable (short) periods from 25,000 to 70,000 years. The
transitions from interglacials to glacial climates appear slow while
the reverse, the deglaciation (or termination) is rapid (5-10 kyrs).
The present interglacial period (the Holocene), which started 11
kyrs ago, appears rather stable with respect to previous warm
periods.
During glacial periods, the Antarctic temperature was about 10C
lower, and the atmosphere contained more aerosols because of a drier
and windy environment. More importantly, the air composition was
different and contained lower concentrations of greenhouse gases
(CO2 and CH4).
A salient correlation between greenhouse gases and temperature
suggested from the 150-kyrs record was fully confirmed for the four
climatic cycles with an almost perfect covariance between
temperature and CO2.
All climatic records cited above contain periodicity at orbital
frequencies (typically, 100, 40 and 20 kyrs), conforming with the
marine records, as well as the astronomical theory of climate (Milankovich
theory).
What was the significance of this paper for your field?
The data extracted from this ice core had implications throughout
the fields of glaciology and paleoclimatology. The CO2 is mostly
stored in the ocean, and the atmospheric content reflects an
equilibrium. This has changed, and so has the carbon cycle. This
implies that the ocean dynamic, ocean chemistry, biological activity
(uptake), and terrestrial biology are involved.
Secondly, the greenhouse gases, by capturing the infrared waves
emitted by earth, prevent cooling and will play the role of
amplifier in the climate system. The effect of CO2 on Earth’s
temperature was suggested first by Svante Arrhenuis.
Here, the Vostok data suggests a small variation (excess) of
insulation (resulting from the long-term earth-sun position changes,
the shortening/lengthening of the seasons) will likely warm the
earth and the ocean which will release additional CO2 that in turn
contributes again to an additional warming. CO2 is an important
actor in the climate system.
In this paper, one of your concluding remarks is that
"Present-day atmospheric burdens of these two important
greenhouse gases [carbon dioxide and methane] seem to have been
unprecedented during the past 420,000 years." Would you please
elaborate on the implications of this statement?
With industrial development and anthropologic activity, massive
burning of fossil carbon as well as intensification of agriculture
released exponential amounts of CO2 and CH4 over the last 150 years.
Present atmospheric composition well surpasses all maximum
concentrations from the ice records over the last 420 kyrs (30% more
CO2, 300% more CH4).
This makes a permanent atmospheric cover over the globe which
prevents the natural cooling of the earth’s surface and making it
so the heat is always "on." A new climate equilibrium is
expected but we have no analog from the past climate (except maybe
at the time of the dinosaurs!). This raises questions for the future
climate and the consequences.
Where is this work today—have you and your colleagues studied the
Vostok ice core further?
Due to the glacier dynamics, the deeper part of the Vostok ice
record (below 3350m) is disturbed and more difficult to interpret.
Following Vostok, the scientific community conducted several
deep-drilling projects in Greenland (GRIP, GISP2, NGRIP) as well as
in Antarctica (European project of EPICA) with two deep-ice cores
(Dome C and Droning Maud land). The Japanese also conducted a
similar project at Dome F.
The EPICA Dome C provided the first results in 2004, with a 740
kyr climatic record (maybe up to 800 kyrs). The greenhouse gas
record is available back to 650 kyrs and fully confirms the Vostok
conclusions with the covariation between CO2 and temperature.
The Vostok record is now shown in schools and used by the
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to evaluate the complex
consequences of future global warming.
If you are free to talk about them, what are your
current projects?
I am involved in studies of new deep ice cores in Antarctica with
the similar aims, as well as in the search for life in the ice. The
deep drilling from Vostok, which was taken down to 3,650 m,
penetrated through an ice massif which was formed from the
refreezing of water from a giant underlying subglacial lake. This
was a very nice surprise from Vostok. The accretion ice samples,
which are now available, have opened an unexpected window to this
unknown environment.