How did you get started studying pain and temperature sensation
and how did chili peppers come into it?
I was interested in cell signaling when I took a post-doc working
with David Julius at the University of California, San Francisco.
His laboratory was interested, in general, in how neurons get
activated by either neurotransmitters or substances in the
environment. He had developed some very clever ways to define novel
receptors for various excitatory stimuli. And one of the projects
bouncing around in his laboratory for some time was this capsaicin
receptor project. It had been known for a long time that the
molecular target of capsaicin, the pungent chemical found in chili
peppers, was likely to be found in sensory nerves. No one had been
able to get their hands on that molecule. So that was the origin of
the project. That was in 1996.
How did researchers come to study chili peppers as a probe for
understanding pain sensation?
|

“What we reasoned was that no one had ever
identified capsaicin inside the body, so it seemed unlikely that nature had put this channel in our pain-sensing neurons just so we could enjoy eating spicy foods.”
|
|
About 60 years ago, it was recognized that capsaicin had specific
effects on certain nerves in our skin. This work was mostly done in
Hungary. The Hungarian culture values paprika and other spicy foods
quite a bit, and so it was sort of the birthplace of capsaicin
research. Some instrumental work came out in the ‘50s and ‘60s,
when Hungarian scientists showed that you could not only cause pain
with capsaicin but could also desensitize pain-sensing neurons with
chronic administration of capsaicin. It was recognized that the way
this was working was that capsaicin was actually killing off the
nerves in the rats that are responsible for initiating pain
sensation. If it was administered to newborn rats, it could actually
kill off a subpopulation of nerves that innervate the skin and allow
the rats to sense pain. So the nerves that mediate non-painful touch
remain perfectly intact, but the nerves that mediate pain sensation
are gone for life. If you administer capsaicin to the adult rat, the
nerve endings die back temporarily but they eventually grow back.
This is one of the reasons why people who eat a lot of
capsaicin-rich food become resistant to capsaicin after a while.
Their nerve endings are actually desensitized.
So tell us about what you discovered and what you reported in
the 1997 Nature paper.
The fundamental discovery was the identification of a protein
that is expressed in a sub-population of nerves; that is, an ion
channel protein that can be activated by capsaicin. That was one
part of it. Another big part was that we showed that this protein is
restricted to just the nerves involved in pain sensation. The real
kicker was that this same protein could also be activated in the
absence of capsaicin simply by increasing temperature into the
painfully hot range. So it’s temperatures above about 42 degrees
Celsius, roughly 108 degrees Fahrenheit, that will activate it, and
that is the temperature where we start to feel pain on our skin.
How did you come to realize that it would also be activated by
temperature?
What we reasoned was that no one had ever identified capsaicin
inside the body, so it seemed unlikely that nature had put this
channel in our pain-sensing neurons just so we could enjoy eating
spicy foods. It seemed more likely that capsaicin, when it was
causing pain, was essentially doubling for something that would
normally provoke a sensation of pain. So what we did was screen
through a number of stimuli we knew were capable of causing pain and
also stimuli that had already been shown to activate sensory neurons
when removed from the animal, and looked at in a dish. A year
earlier, two different groups had shown that if you take the sensory
nerves that normally innervate a rat’s skin and put them in a dish
and record from them electrically, you could activate a
sub-population of those nerves by increasing temperature. So our
group did the same thing with this molecule we had recently
isolated. We were able to express it in a cell line that normally
didn’t make it. And not only did these cells become sensitive to
capsaicin, but they became sensitive to heat.
Why do you think the paper has been so remarkably influential?
I think it’s a couple of things. One is that this provided—I
think for the first time—a molecular handle on that population of
neurons involved in pain sensation. It gives you a way of marking
those neurons, of specifically manipulating those neurons. So that’s
one thing. I think there are two other features that made this stick
in people’s minds. First is that the molecule itself looks like it’s
very important for pain sensation. If you remove that molecule from
mice, they are not only completely insensitive to capsaicin, but
also less sensitive to painful heat than normal mice. So the
capsaicin receptor itself represents a target you can go after in
developing drugs that can combat pain. The final thing is the
recognition that this particular molecule could act as essentially a
molecular thermometer. That led our lab and others to look for
related molecules that could be involved in temperature sensations
over other ranges. We’ve now found a whole family of these
molecules; there are at least six of these molecules expressed in
mammals that act as temperature sensors, activated over different
temperature ranges.
Do they work to help maintain body temperature, as well?
That is a question to which we still don’t know the answer. We
strongly suspect they do. So far, we have been removing them from
mice one by one, but we haven’t yet found one that’s
indispensable for maintaining normal body temperature. Out of the
three or four knocked out in mice so far, those mice have all shown
normal body temperature for the most part.
How else has the research in this area evolved in the eight
years since you published your Nature paper?
In a couple of interesting ways. One is that with the molecules
in hand now, people have been able to understand in much greater
detail how it is we become more sensitive to heat when tissues are
injured. If you have an infection or inflammation, your skin becomes
more sensitive to heat or touch than normal. It turns out that this
capsaicin receptor is very important for the enhanced perception of
heat that happens after injury. Work from a number of laboratories
has now led to the understanding of some of the molecule details of
how this happens; how the protein itself gets changed, and how the
expression level gets changed. It gets modified in ways that make it
more sensitive. So our understanding of how injury and inflammation
sensitize our nervous systems to pain has really moved forward.
Another thing that we recognized by looking at other related
proteins is that heat and cold are actually sensed by structurally
similar channels, probably in biophysically similar ways. And
finally one of the things we’ve been most interested in is that it’s
not just nerves that make these temperature-sensitive channels, but
some of the epithelial cells that line our skin or internal organs
also make some of these channels. There’s growing evidence from
our lab and others that these skin cells are probably cooperating
with nerves to help us perceive temperatures.
How does that work?
We’re not entirely sure yet. The channels that are tuned to the
warm temperature range, say 30-42 degrees, are very highly expressed
in skin cells and when those skin cells get exposed to warmth, the
channels get activated. What we presume is going on is that the skin
cells are releasing chemical substances that are then detected by
the nerves that come very close to them. That’s the model right
now. We don’t have absolute proof that that’s what’s going on.
This is work from several different laboratories. If you remove
those channels expressed in the skin cells, you’ll see the animals’
perception of warm temperatures change.
When the capsaicin paper was published, there was talk of this
leading to new medications to deal with pain. Has there been progress
in this area?
There certainly has. Not long after the discovery, a number of
pharmaceutical companies began looking for chemicals able to block
this receptor. The consequences of the discovery that I discussed
before were mostly from the standpoint of a research scientist. But
from the standpoint of medicine, one of the most important things,
with this channel now in hand, this capsaicin receptor in hand, is
that companies were now able to set up very easy screening protocols
to see which compounds might be able to block this channel. So they’ve
been doing that, and a number of promising compounds have come out
of that research. In fact, a recent study just came out a couple of
months ago, in which one group reported that they could block the
pain associated with an experimental form of bone cancer by
administering a blocker of the capsaicin receptor.
What questions would you ideally like to answer in the next few
years?
I think one of the big questions is given that there are multiple
sensors for heat and warmth, how is the body using these different
sensors in different ways? They seem to be expressed in different
cells, some in neurons, some not, and they seem to be responsible
for different aspects of temperature sensation. But we still don’t
have a clear picture of how the body is using them all to sense heat
and pain. That’s one question. Another is that we have much more
limited information on how mechanically evoked pain is perceived. If
you hit your thumb with a hammer or poke yourself with a pin, how is
that pain perceived? How does that pain caused by pressure evolve?
Does it involve the same class of proteins or different classes? The
early indication suggests maybe some of these same channels are
involved.
Are you surprised that so much of your research focus is now on
the subject of pain?
Our focus isn’t exclusively on pain now. I would say that the
one overriding theme of work in my laboratory is temperature. We’ve
been involved in both pain-related and non-pain-related aspects of
temperature perception, including the kind of questions we discussed
earlier such as how body temperature is regulated, things like that.
I guess I never set out to focus on any one particular area. I
figured that I would just let the answers tell us where to go next.
This was a lesson that my previous advisors taught me, and it has
certainly worked well so far.
Michael Caterina, M.D., Ph.D.
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Baltimore, MD, USA