|
Science in Sweden, 2002-06
Sweden's world share of
science and social-science papers over a recent five-year period,
expressed as a percentage of papers in each of 21 fields in the Thomson
Scientific database. Also, Sweden's relative citation impact compared to
the world average in each field, expressed as a percentage.
|
Field |
Percentage
of papers from Sweden |
Relative
impact compared to world
|
|
Immunology |
3.38 |
-18 |
|
Ecology/Environmental |
3.02 |
+41 |
| Biology
& Biochemistry |
2.68 |
+13 |
|
Neurosciences & Behavior |
2.45 |
+1 |
| Clinical
Medicine |
2.44 |
+29 |
|
Molecular Biology |
2.19 |
+6 |
|
Pharmacology |
2.16 |
+30 |
| Social
Sciences |
2.13 |
+17 |
|
Microbiology |
2.13 |
+14 |
| Plant &
Animal Sciences |
1.97 |
+33 |
|
**<---
Sweden's overall percent share, all
fields: 1.95 --->** |
|
Economics & Business |
1.91 |
-4 |
|
Geosciences |
1.88 |
+30 |
| Space
Science |
1.86 |
+20 |
|
Engineering |
1.62 |
+28 |
| Physics
|
1.61 |
+32 |
|
Psychology/Psychiatry |
1.61 |
-10 |
|
Materials Science |
1.59 |
+6 |
|
Chemistry |
1.45 |
+26 |
|
Mathematics |
1.37 |
+32 |
|
Agricultural Sciences |
1.34 |
+68 |
| Computer
Science |
1.23 |
+31 |
Between 2002 and 2006,
Thomson Scientific indexed 79,065 papers that listed at least one author
address in Sweden. Of those papers, the highest percentage appeared in
journals classified under the heading of immunology. As the right-hand
column indicates, the citations-per-paper (impact) mark for Swedish
immunology papers was 18% below the 2002-06 world average for the field
(8.66 cites per paper for Sweden, versus a world mark of 10.62 cites per
paper). On the other hand, Sweden-based researchers performed strongly
in most of the other fields shown, notably in agricultural sciences (68%
above the world average), ecology/environmental (41% above), plant &
animal sciences (+33%), mathematics (+32%) and physics (+32%).
View
the 10-year country rankings for
Sweden,
1997-April 30, 2007.
|

Previous Page | Return to SCI-BYTES
Main Menu
| Return to 2007 Menu
If you came from the Thomson Scientific Web site, click
here to return
|